Ontario's major power consumers: major investors, major employers -- playing a major role in communities across Ontario.

 
  Email
  Password
  
  







OEB
Dec 15, 2008
Lennox GS not required for reliability beyond September 2009

Sep 8, 2008
Hearings Underway on 20-Year Power Plan for Ontario

Sep 5, 2008
Hydro One Seeking Double-Digit Rate Hikes in 2009 and 2010

Jun 13, 2008
AMPCO Petitions Ontario Cabinet for Just and Reasonable Rates for Manufacturers

May 22, 2008
OEB Dismisses AMPCO Motion to Review Decision on Oshawa Rates

May 12, 2008
Province Appoints Hon. Howard Wetston to Second Five Year Term as OEB Chair

Apr 28, 2008
AMPCO Files Evidence in OPG Payments Application

Apr 8, 2008
AMPCO Files Motion to Review OEB Decision on Oshawa PUC Rates

Feb 14, 2008
OEB Denies Interim Payment Increase for OPG Regulated Assets

Oct 12, 2007
AMPCO Comments on Licence Conditions for Smart Metering Entity

Aug 29, 2007
Hydro One Consults on 2008 Distribution Rates

Aug 29, 2007
OEB Consults on Incentive-based Distribution Rates

Aug 17, 2007
OEB issues decision in Hydro One transmission rates case

Jun 5, 2007
AMPCO Files Final Argument in Hydro One Transmission Rates Case

Apr 12, 2007
OEB Decision on Ramp Rate Market Rule Amendment

Mar 27, 2007
AMPCO appeal of IESO ramp rate market rule goes to hearing

Mar 21, 2007
OEB issues decision in IESO 2007 Fees Submission

Feb 9, 2007
AMPCO appeals IESO ramp rate market rule amendment

Feb 9, 2007
OEB approves AMPCO's request for stay of IESO ramp rate market rule

Dec 1, 2006
AMPCO comments on IPSP filing guidelines (EB-2006-0207)

Aug 18, 2006
AMPCO comments on filing guidelines for transmission and distribution rates and projects (EB-2006-0170)

Jul 26, 2006
EB-2006-0064 Payment amounts for OPG prescribed assets

Jul 25, 2006
EB-2005-0551 Adam White testifies at OEB hearing on Natural Gas Electricity Interface

Jul 18, 2006
OEB Staff Proposal on minimum filing requirements for transmission and distribution rates and projects (EB-2006-0170)

Jul 6, 2006
OPG payment amounts for prescribed assets (EB029006-0064)

Jul 26, 2006 Print Article
EB-2006-0064 Payment amounts for OPG prescribed assets

25 July 2006

 

Kirsten Walli

Board Secretary

Ontario Energy Board

P.O. Box 2319

2300 Yonge Street, 26th Floor

Toronto ON M4P 1E4

 

Sent by email: boardsec@oeb.gov.on.ca 

 

Re: Payment amounts for OPG prescribed assets (EB-2006-0064)

 

 

Dear Madam:

 

I am writing with comments on the staff paper discussing various regulatory models for setting payment amounts for OPG prescribed assets.

 

Generally, with regard to the appropriate regulatory model to be used by the OEB in setting payment amounts for the output of prescribed assets, AMPCO supports the staff recommendation that an initial incentive regulation formula be applied to the existing base payments while at the same time laying the foundation to permit a full cost-of-service review in the future.

 

While we share concerns expressed about the costs and complexity of a cost-of-service approach, our primary concern relates to our interests in keeping electricity prices as low as possible. In this respect, we support a starting point based on the payment amounts currently established in regulation. The current prices demonstrably serve a balance of interests: to preserve the viability of the assets, to sustain the viability of the company, and most of all to keep prices as low as possible to protect the interests of consumers.

 

Done correctly, we believe incorporating some elements of incentive regulation can drive efficiency improvements.

 

We support the identification of appropriate benchmarks as a means of assessing costs and trends and to set productivity factors.

 

An advantage of the recommended approach is that it does not require reaching a common understanding of the transition of the Ontario electricity sector to some future end state and the characteristics of that end state in the current proceeding. If or when the features of that market are better defined and broadly accepted then the approach can be adapted to facilitate such a transition.

 

I trust these comments are useful to the Board. We would be happy to provide further information or to discuss our views more fully wherever that would be convenient.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

 

 

 

Adam S. White

President