Ontario's major power consumers: major investors, major employers -- playing a major role in communities across Ontario.

 
  Email
  Password
  
  







OEB
Dec 15, 2008
Lennox GS not required for reliability beyond September 2009

Sep 8, 2008
Hearings Underway on 20-Year Power Plan for Ontario

Sep 5, 2008
Hydro One Seeking Double-Digit Rate Hikes in 2009 and 2010

Jun 13, 2008
AMPCO Petitions Ontario Cabinet for Just and Reasonable Rates for Manufacturers

May 22, 2008
OEB Dismisses AMPCO Motion to Review Decision on Oshawa Rates

May 12, 2008
Province Appoints Hon. Howard Wetston to Second Five Year Term as OEB Chair

Apr 28, 2008
AMPCO Files Evidence in OPG Payments Application

Apr 8, 2008
AMPCO Files Motion to Review OEB Decision on Oshawa PUC Rates

Feb 14, 2008
OEB Denies Interim Payment Increase for OPG Regulated Assets

Oct 12, 2007
AMPCO Comments on Licence Conditions for Smart Metering Entity

Aug 29, 2007
Hydro One Consults on 2008 Distribution Rates

Aug 29, 2007
OEB Consults on Incentive-based Distribution Rates

Aug 17, 2007
OEB issues decision in Hydro One transmission rates case

Jun 5, 2007
AMPCO Files Final Argument in Hydro One Transmission Rates Case

Apr 12, 2007
OEB Decision on Ramp Rate Market Rule Amendment

Mar 27, 2007
AMPCO appeal of IESO ramp rate market rule goes to hearing

Mar 21, 2007
OEB issues decision in IESO 2007 Fees Submission

Feb 9, 2007
AMPCO appeals IESO ramp rate market rule amendment

Feb 9, 2007
OEB approves AMPCO's request for stay of IESO ramp rate market rule

Dec 1, 2006
AMPCO comments on IPSP filing guidelines (EB-2006-0207)

Aug 18, 2006
AMPCO comments on filing guidelines for transmission and distribution rates and projects (EB-2006-0170)

Jul 26, 2006
EB-2006-0064 Payment amounts for OPG prescribed assets

Jul 25, 2006
EB-2005-0551 Adam White testifies at OEB hearing on Natural Gas Electricity Interface

Jul 18, 2006
OEB Staff Proposal on minimum filing requirements for transmission and distribution rates and projects (EB-2006-0170)

Jul 6, 2006
OPG payment amounts for prescribed assets (EB029006-0064)

Jun 13, 2008 Print Article
AMPCO Petitions Ontario Cabinet for Just and Reasonable Rates for Manufacturers

June 9, 2008

 

Ms Shelly Jamieson

Clerk of the Executive Council

Executive Council Office 

The Cabinet Office

Room 4440, Whitney Block

99 Wellesley Street West

Toronto, ON   M7A 1A1

 
Petition to Lieutenant Governor in Council by the Association of Major Power Consumers in Ontario

 

Dear Madam:

 

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 34 of the Ontario Energy Board Act (the “OEB Act”), we are hereby petitioning the Lieutenant Governor in Council (“LGIC”) to seek an order providing policy direction to the Ontario Energy Board (the “Board”) respecting the exercise of the Board’s legal power to order rates which over-charge certain customers so that others may be subsidized.

 

The Petitioner is the Association of Major Power Consumers in Ontario (“AMPCO”), a not-for-profit consumer interest advocacy organization that serves the interests of Ontario’s industrial power consumers.

 

This Petition is filed by AMPCO in respect of the decision of the Board dated May 16, 2008, respecting a Motion for Re-Hearing brought by AMPCO (Board file EB-2008-0099) concerning a previous Order of the Board approving a revenue requirement and setting distribution rates for the Oshawa Public Utility Corporation (Board File EB-2007-0710).

 

AMPCO’s motion requested that the Board reconsider its previous decision authorizing distribution rates that over-charged large volume customers in a range of 125 to 257 percent in 2008. The Board declined to review the decision on the grounds that it has "wide discretion" with respect to allocating costs among customers such that it may require some customers to over-pay for the benefit of others, even where those others are the shareholder of the utility itself. The decision of the Board effectively asserts its prerogative to order rates to advance a range of social policy objectives at its discretion. AMPCO submits that it is inappropriate for the Board to authorize subsidies between customers. Whether, and under what conditions the Board should exercise that power is, in our submission, a matter that is appropriately determined by government policy.

 

AMPCO submits that this case is appropriate for review by the LGIC. The Petition raises two key questions:

 

1. Should the OEB's rate making authority be used to impose higher rates on some customers so that other customers can receive subsidies; and

2. If it is appropriate to do so, under what conditions and in consideration of what factors?

 

This question is particularly acute in light of the Divisional Court's decision in Low Income Energy Network v Ontario Energy Board (dated May 16, 2008), which held that the OEB may set rates taking into account a customer's ability to pay. If the LGIC considers that it is appropriate for the Board to do so, AMPCO requests the opportunity to provide submissions on the factors that the OEB should take into account.

 

AMPCO’s written submissions that it provided to the Board in support of this position are attached. Please contact me if any further information is required in connection with this Petition.

 

Sincerely yours,

 

Adam White

President

 

Attachments:
AMPCO's Motion to OEB for Re-Hearing of Decision Ordering Rates for Oshawa PUC
Excerpt of OEB decision on AMPCO's Motion

Copies to:

Mr. Howard Wetston, Q.C., Chair, Ontario Energy Board

Mr. Peter Wallace, Deputy Minister of Energy

Mr. Irv Harrell, Chairperson, Oshawa Public Utilities Corporation

AMPCO members
Parties to OEB Proceedings EB-2007-0710 and EB-2008-0099