Ontario's major power consumers: major investors, major employers -- playing a major role in communities across Ontario.

 
  Email
  Password
  
  







Bulletins
Oct 28, 2009
Bruce Power Agreement Amended

Sep 24, 2009
Ontario Launches Feed In Tariff Program

Sep 22, 2009
OPG Contingency Support Agreement

Sep 3, 2009
Ontario Closes Four Coal Units

Jun 29, 2009
Ontario Suspends Nuclear Procurement

Apr 3, 2009
Negative Energy Prices in Ontario

Feb 23, 2009
Energy Minister Smitherman Tables Green Energy Act

Feb 9, 2009
OPG Reduces CO2 Adder to $1/tonne

Sep 18, 2008
Energy Minister Smitherman Directs Power Authority to Revisit System Plan

May 16, 2008
Ontario Caps Output by Coal Plants

Mar 7, 2008
Ontario Invites Proposals for New Nuclear Reactors

Mar 7, 2008
Proposed Emission Limits would Effectively Ban Non-Emergency Use of Diesel Engines for Demand Management

Dec 21, 2007
Ontario's Electricity Agency Review Panel Issues Phase 2 Report

Nov 29, 2007
Ontario Throne Speech

Nov 27, 2007
Hydro One Appoints President and CEO

Nov 2, 2007
OPG to Seek 14 Percent Rate Hike on Base Load Output

Oct 12, 2007
AMPCO 2007 Fall Members' Meeting

Sep 27, 2007
Hydro One Launches New Energy Effeciency Program for Business Customers

Jun 27, 2007
Ontario Agency Review Panel Releases Phase 1 Report on Executive Compensation

Jun 18, 2007
McGuinty Government Sets Greenhouse Gas Targets

Jan 30, 2007
Study Finds Up to $182 Million Annual Savings From Electricity Demand Response in Mid-Atlantic Region

Jan 27, 2007
Ontario to review electricity agencies

Jan 10, 2007
An energy policy for Europe: Commission steps up to the energy challenges of the 21st Century

Dec 4, 2006
ELCON paper faults organized markets, calls for

Sep 5, 2006
IESO proposal to modify ramp rate assumption

Jan 30, 2007 Print Article
Study Finds Up to $182 Million Annual Savings From Electricity Demand Response in Mid-Atlantic Region

VALLEY FORGE, Pa., Jan. 30 /PRNewswire/ -- A study has found that a modest reduction in electricity use during peak hours would reduce energy prices by at least $57 million to $182 million annually in the Mid-Atlantic region.

The study, prepared by The Brattle Group, examined the effects of reducing electricity use by three percent during the highest use hours for five utility areas. It notes that, "More widespread participation and deeper curtailments would result in even greater price impacts."

 

The five Mid-Atlantic public utility commissions and PJM Interconnection worked together on the study. The objective was to demonstrate actual savings possible from greater use of demand response.

 

Demand response refers to a customer's intentional reduction in the use of electricity during periods when electric supplies are tight or electricity costs are high because the most expensive generation units must be run. Reducing electricity demand at these times can decrease use of the most expensive sources of power. It also can avoid power shortages, and enhance grid reliability.

 

A three percent reduction during the peak use hours for each utility studied would have reduced energy market prices by $8 to $25 per megawatt- hour, according to the study. Actual demand response typically has been less than one percent of use during peak hours, according to PJM.

 

In addition to reductions in electricity prices, demand response participants were estimated to save $9 million to $26 million for energy annually and another $73 million for capacity charges.

 

The study quantified the economic benefits of demand response by comparing prices without and with demand response reductions during the top 20 five-hour periods in 2005 for each utility. The five utility areas were Baltimore Gas and Electric, Delmarva Power, PECO, Pepco and Public Service Electric and Gas Company.

 

The public utility commissions and PJM sponsored the study as part of the Mid-Atlantic Distributed Recourses Initiative (MADRI). The commissions in Delaware, the District of Columbia, Maryland, New Jersey and Pennsylvania along with PJM and federal agencies comprise MADRI. It was formed in 2004 to identify and remedy retail barriers to the deployment of distributed generation and demand response in the Mid-Atlantic region.

 

Utility commissioner representatives to MADRI unanimously noted the study's importance in supporting regional advances in demand response.

 

"This study documents the substantial public benefits of even a small customer demand response when prices are high," said District of Columbia Commissioner Rick Morgan, who chairs MADRI. "It points out the value of regional coordination among the Mid-Atlantic states."

 

"Peak demand drives up the price of electricity for everyone," said New Jersey Board of Public Utilities President Jeanne M. Fox. "This study clearly demonstrates how a very minor decrease in electric use during peak demand by a few users can provide unequivocal economic benefits for all. It will be important in developing policies with our regional partners to address this critical issue."

 

"This study and the MADRI's efforts will be invaluable for states such as Pennsylvania as we continue to successfully implement alternative energy laws and to empower our energy consumers with innovative energy efficiency, demand- side response and advanced metering programs," said Pennsylvania Public Utility Commissioner Kim Pizzingrilli. "Regional solutions developed by the MADRI process will continue to enhance the work of the states."

 

"Fully valuing demand response and other demand reductions enables wholesale markets to empower customers and to deliver them more benefits," said Allen M. Freifeld, Maryland Public Service Commissioner.

 

"The report shows that demand response is very important for a state like Delaware that experiences significant transmission congestion," said Arnetta McRae, chair, Delaware Public Service Commission.

 

"Now that this report has demonstrated the economic benefit of demand response, we will work with the states in implementing initiatives that provide consumers financial signals and incentives to alter their use of electricity in response to grid conditions," said Audrey A. Zibelman, PJM executive vice president and chief operating officer.

 

PJM ensures the reliability of the regional electric power supply system serving 51 million people in all or parts of Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia and the District of Columbia. It administers the regional wholesale market for electricity and plans transmission expansion improvements to maintain grid reliability and relieve congestion.

 

The Brattle Group prepared the study, "Quantifying Demand Response Benefits In PJM." The Brattle Group provides consulting services and expert testimony on economic, financial, regulatory, and strategic issues to corporations, law firms, and public agencies worldwide.

The study is available at: http://www.energetics.com/madri/pdfs/BrattleGroupReport.pdf.

Source: PJM Interconnection